Thank you very much. This is great now. Appreciate all your help and revisions. Thank you once again! You did a wonderful job.
Read persons discussion and respond in 250 words Also include one in text bluebook citation. Give your opinion and agree or disagree.
A prior review of the case Torcaso v. Watkins,  367 U.S. 488. (1961). had been on appeal from the Court of appeals of Maryland.  there it was rejected, Torcaso in defense of the ruling, went forward against the court of Appeals of Maryland. face with the old laws of Maryland, Torcaso had a uphill battle against the state of Maryland and the Supreme court of Maryland.  all whom denied Torcaso his Constitutional rights. 
Torcaso was a appointed official to the office of Notary Public by then the Governor of Maryland. but under the state of Maryland, their constitution asks before he could receive his commission to serve that he announce his belief in God as the state of Maryland Constitution ask of him. 
Article VI, should be review again, if the Constitution and laws of the United States are Ã¢â‚¬Å“the supreme law of the land.Ã¢â‚¬Â where federal officials, judges, are required to take an oath to support the Constitution. yes, to support the constitution only in its self, but not in the name of God. A person or anyone should not have to swear an oath, unless it is upon the symbol they sworn to honor and protect. 
Torcaso rebuke the Court of Appeals of Maryland, including the Md. Const. article 37,  Ã¢â‚¬Å“requiring persons who were qualified for any office of profit or trust in the state of Maryland must declare their belief in the existence of God.Ã¢â‚¬Â Torcaso sought for relief under the ground his constitution rights were being violated. the first  and Fourteenth Amendment. 
Many of the U.S Constitutional laws, Torcaso believe were being violated or over looked, the Bill of Rights, Fundamental Freedom, Freedom of Religion, Free Exercise of Religion, by the heavy strength and authority of the State of Maryland, who favor a single believer, oneÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s who were willing to volunteer and say they believe in the existence of God. 
When the framers wrote into law the Constitution, they wanted to put the peoples Ã¢â‚¬Å“safely out of reachÃ¢â‚¬Â of religious test oaths, involving Article VI, a statement which read Ã¢â‚¬Å“no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.Ã¢â‚¬Â it is supported by Girouard v. United States,  328 U.S. 61, 69, (1946). which said, Ã¢â‚¬Å“the test oath is abhorrent to our tradition.Ã¢â‚¬Â the opinion of the court was also view the same in Reynolds v. United States,  98 U.S. 145, (1878). Davis v. Beason,  133 U.S. 333. (1890). Everson v. Board of Education,  330 U.S. I (1947). Cantwell v. Connecticut,  310 U.S. 296 (1940).
The court opinion in the Torcaso v. Watkins were strong reviews as the previous court cases. the first and Fourteenth Amendment have a long reach far more intruding depth. Ã¢â‚¬Å“neither a State nor the Federal Government can constitutionally force a person to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion.Ã¢â‚¬Â [16
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more