Thank you very much. This is great now. Appreciate all your help and revisions. Thank you once again! You did a wonderful job.
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 8, 9
Link (Word doc):
Source Evaluation Worksheet
Minimum of 5 scholarly sources
to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source.
You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source.
Click on the following link for an example of an annotation.
Link: Annotation Example
Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults.
American Sociological Review
, 51, 541-554.
The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.
This activity will be graded using the Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric.
Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuantity of Sources _9627
5.0 to >4.25 pts
5 or more sources
4.25 to >3.75 pts
3.75 to >3.0 pts
1 or no sources
/ 5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality /Reliability of Sources _5246
All works are from scholarly sources.
Most works are from scholarly sources; no more than 1 from a substantive source.
Some works are from scholarly sources; no more than 2 from substantive sources.
Sources substantive or lower in quality.
Few or no sources reach even substantive level; popular sources cited.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecency of Sources _7484
All sources less than 5 years old; if older, historical significance explained
1 source older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance
2 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance
3 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance
4 or more sources older than 5 years old w/no explanation of historical significance
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Fluency of Annotations _8926
25.0 to >21.25 pts
All annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; clearly conveying main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.
21.25 to >18.75 pts
Most annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; give sense of main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.
18.75 to >12.0 pts
Annotations are well-written but do not describe scope of source material; do not give clear idea of how source will be used in essay.
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Annotations do not describe scope of source material and/or do not give idea of how they will be used in essay.
Annotations lack detail, give no idea of how they will be used in essay OR no annotations.
/ 25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA and Documentation _7412
10.0 to >8.5 pts
Citations are formatted correctly.
8.5 to >7.5 pts
There are a few formatting errors.
7.5 to >6.0 pts
There are some formatting errors.
6.0 to >0.0 pts
There are many and/or frequent formatting errors.
There is little or no adherence to APA format in the document.
/ 10.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0 out of 50.0
I’ll write free-form comments when assessing students
Remove points from rubric
Don’t post Outcomes results to Learning Mastery Gradebook
Use this rubric for assignment grading
Hide score total for assessment results
Rating max scoreto > pts
Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it.
Find a Rubric
Total Points: 5 out of 5
I’ll write free-form comments when assessing students
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more